Output – LIFE2 – Workflow for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers

Output Name: Output – LIFE2 – Workflow for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers

Title: Workflow for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers
Number of pages or page numbers:1
Section:

Date Released: 03/09/2008

URI for Output: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9061/4/9061_Legal_deposits_workflow.pdf

Summary of contents: Pdf version of Visio Workflow for the British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers

Output – Life2 – Workflow for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers

Output Name: Output – Life2 – Workflow for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers

Title: Workflow for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers
Number of pages or page numbers:1
Section:

Date Released: 03/09/2008

URI for Output: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9061/5/9061_Burney_collection_workflow.pdf

Summary of contents: Pdf version of Visio Workflow for the British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers

Output – Life2 – Output – Life2 -Spreadsheet for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers

Output Name: Output – Life2 –Spreadsheet for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers

Title:Spreadsheet for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Legal Deposit of Newspapers
Number of pages or page numbers: 4 tabs

Date Released:27 November 2008

URI for Output:http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9061/6/9061_Legal_Deposit_Spreadsheet.xls

Summary of contents:This spreadsheet contains the exact costings for the SHERPA Leap Case Study.  The  Spreadsheet has 4 tabs

Tab1 – Introduction

Tab2 – Life Cycle Processes and Costs

Tab3 – Acoronyms and staff costs

Tab4  – Summary

Additional information:    Useful spreadsheet containing costings.

Output – Life2 – Spreadsheet for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers

Output Name: Output – Life2 –Spreadsheet for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers

Title: Spreadsheet for British Library Newspapers Case Study – Burney Digital Newspapers
Number of pages or page numbers: 4 tabs

Date Released:27 November 2008

URI for Output: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9061/7/9061_Burney_Collection_Spreadsheet.xls

Summary of contents:This spreadsheet contains the exact costings for the SHERPA Leap Case Study.  The  Spreadsheet has 4 tabs

Tab1 – Introduction

Tab2 – Life Cycle Processes and Costs

Tab3 – Acoronyms and staff costs

Tab4  – Summary

Additional information:    Useful spreadsheet containing costings

Output – Life2 – Spreadsheet for SHERPA Leap Case Study

Output Name: Output – Life2 – Spreadsheet for SHERPA Leap Case Study

Title: Spreadsheet for SHERPA Leap Case Study
Number of pages or page numbers: 4 tabs

Date Released:27 November 2008

URI for Output: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9032/3/9032.xls

Summary of contents:This spreadsheet contains the exact costings for the SHERPA Leap Case Study.  The  Spreadsheet has 4 tabs

Tab1 – Introduction

Tab2 – Life Cycle Processes and Costs

Tab3 – Acoronyms and staff costs

Tab4  – Summary

Additional information:    Useful spreadsheet containing costings.

Output – Life2 – Spreadsheet for SHERPA DP Case Study

Output Name: Output – Life2 – Spreadsheet for SHERPA DP Case Study

Title: Spreadsheet for SHERPA DP Case Study
Number of pages or page numbers: 4 tabs

Date Released:27 November 2008

URI for Output: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/9062/3/9062.xls

Summary of contents:This spreadsheet contains the exact costings for the SHERPA DP Case Study.  The  Spreadsheet has 4 tabs

Tab1 – Introduction

Tab2 – Life Cycle Processes and Costs

Tab3 – Acoronyms and staff costs

Tab4  – Summary

Additional information:    Useful spreadsheet containing costings.
Comments:

Output – Lirolem -‘a few post project thoughts…’:software and tools

Title:’a few post project thoughts…’ from lirolem project blog

Section: blog posting

Page: blog entry

Summary of contents:
stepping into a discussion of software selection:
repository for Lincoln
” However, the Open Source products [ePrints, Fedora, DSpace], as of Autumn 2007, offered a thriving academic community of users and developers but little to no multimedia functionality. Coming from working with commercial DAMs, I was pretty surprised by how non-text ‘assets’ seemed to have been neglected for so long in the academic world. Things are now clearly changing thanks to the JISC funding that’s supporting projects like LIROLEM, Kultur and SNEEP, but it does feel like a step back in time when I use repository software, which still suffers from the legacy of a ‘text publishing’ workflow process.”

repository related workspace for architecture faculty
“When it became clear that the Virtual Studio [the tool to support the architectural faculty] had more in common with a wiki than a repository (as understood within the academic world), I set up a Virtual Studio on Blackboard using the Campus Pack modules. Within the tight confines that a Blackboard System Administrator has, we had a Virtual Studio space that third year students were invited to test. It wasn’t everything that the Virtual Studio is anticipated to be, but it did allow students and staff to upload materials, create galleries of designs, discuss their work and blog. In principle, this seemed closer to what the Architects wanted. Visually, it still looks like Blackboard and although provided a useful test-case, does not meet the ‘designerly’ UI requirements that the Architects want. In other words, it’s not like using Flickr, YouTube or other rapidly evolving cutting-edge web 2.0 applications. Just as I found user expectations running away from our potential to develop the DAM at Amnesty, the same has always been evident in the LIROLEM/Virtual Studio Project. ”

Comments:
this offers a useful commnetary on the current nature of the three key pieces of repository software and their fit with non- textual assets, user expectations, and desired functionality.

i suggest it has implications for the role of repositories in relation to digital workspaces, and trying to use single systems. it is also of note that Blackboard ended up being the tool they wanted to build in…

Date Released: 29th April 2008

URI for Output:http://pebblepad.lincoln.ac.uk/viewasset.aspx?oid=10236&type=thought

Output – DExt – Comparison of Metadata Schemas

Output Name: Output – DExt – Comparison of Metadata Schemas

Title: DExt – Comparison of Metadata Schemas
Number of pages or page numbers: 2

Date Released: 3 April 2007

URI for Output: http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/dext/comparison3.doc

Summary of contents:

In order to assess the different metadata schemas that are relevant to the description of qualitative data resources, a brief comparison document has been produced. A comaprison of Data Document Initiative (DDI), Text Encoding Initiative (TEI), Qualitative Data Interchange Format (QDIF), UKDA Quali XML Schema, Dublin Core (DC), Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS).

Additonal information:

Output – DISC-UK – Datashare – Article about Datashare project

Output Name: Output – DISC-UK – Datashare – Article about Datashare project

Title: Article about Datashare project
Number of pages or page numbers: 6

Date Released: July 2008

URI for Output: http://www.disc-uk.org/docs/Aliss_article_DataShare.pdf

Summary of contents:

Article about the Datashare project published in ALISS Quarterly, quite a good summary of the project.

Ouput – DISC-UK Datashare – Outreach and dissemination

Output Name: Output – DISC-UK Datashare – Outreach and dissemination

Title: DISC-UK Datashare – Outreach and dissemination
Number of pages or page numbers: various (several ouptuts summarised)
Section:

Date Released:after September 2007

URI for Output:

Dissemination plan based on stakeholder analysis and experience in first year

Available in Project Plan, pages 13-15:

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/project_plan_datashare_webversion.pdf

Experience-based outputs for repository managers, e.g. use cases, scenarios or toolkits

Not sure where these are generated from other projects and inform DISC-UK or have been generated interally.

Papers and presentations at relevant national and international conferences

Available from: http://www.disc-uk.org/publications.html

Page is plit into ‘Publications’ (including presentations), ‘References on data support’, ‘References on data sharing’

Documentation, best practice guidelines, fact sheets on range of topics

Not sure where these are?

Design a training programme for support of research data analysis, management, sharing in libraries/institutions

 

Summary of contents:

• Dissemination plan based on stakeholder analysis and experience in first year
• Experience-based outputs for repository managers, e.g. use cases, scenarios or toolkits
• Papers and presentations at relevant national and international conferences
• Documentation, best practice guidelines, fact sheets on range of topics
• Design a training programme for support of research data analysis, management, sharing in libraries/institutions

Additonal information: